[kwlug disc.] Apache vs IIS system call chart

[John Van Ostrand]

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:30 -0500, Chris Bruner wrote:

> It was posted on slashdot and most people there were calling it FUD,
> because it showed two different applications, and because the windows
> one is C++ which uses classes which always have more functions due to
> template possibilities.  
> 
> It would have been nice if both were apache, then at least it would be
> apples and apples. 


I think it is a valid case. This is a comparison of two *solutions*,
albeit a very simple solution. Open Source web serving vs. Microsoft web
serving.

The point I got from it is simple: MS software is inelegant and more
complicated (internally) that it needs to be. One should expect the same
from this as with any unnecessarily complicated system: more problems.

It would be interesting to see the comparison you mentioned:
Apache/Linux vs. Apache/Windows.
--
John Van Ostrand
         Net Direct Inc.
 
CTO, co-CEO
564 Weber St. N. Unit 12
   Waterloo, ON N2L 5C6 
 map 
john at netdirect.ca
        Ph: 519-883-1172
 ext.5102
Linux Solutions / IBM
Hardware
        Fx: 519-883-8533


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.ccjclearline.com/pipermail/kwlug-disc/attachments/20070206/e77542ae/attachment.htm